Published on Friday, September 7, 2001 in the Boston Globe
Cold Facts on Alaska Oil

Editorial

 

THE BLUE-GREEN alliance between labor and environmentalists frayed badly over

the vote in Congress last month to authorize drilling in the Arctic National

Wildlife Refuge. Thirty-six Democrats voted for the Bush administration

initiative, many on the strength of lobbying by the Teamsters and other union

officials who said it would create 750,000 jobs. Now a new report by an

economist with strong ties to labor debunks that figure. It should help

redirect the national debate toward the common goal of developing permanent

jobs that do not despoil a pristine wilderness.

The study the Teamsters used to back their claims was commissioned in 1990 by
the American Petroleum Institute. It projected jobs created not just by the

drilling itself, but by the ripple effect throughout the whole economy of

falling energy prices presumably achieved through new supplies of oil

uncovered at the Arctic refuge. But the study overestimated the amount the

oil would represent on the world market, according to Dean Baker of the

Center for Economic and Policy Research.


Using current estimates from the Energy Information Agency, Baker found that
the earlier study overstated the size of the potential oil flows by a factor

of three. Even with the multiplier effect, Baker estimates that only 46,300

new jobs could be attributed to opening the refuge to drilling.


Another flaw with the Petroleum Institute's report is that it assumed none of
the other oil-producing nations would take action to prop up fuel prices,

counteracting much of the projected benefit to the American economy.

Historically, OPEC's behavior in the face of oil gluts hardly supports the

theory that those nations would sit idly by.


Third, even the original study admitted that the jobs created would be
temporary. Peak production is expected to last less than 10 years, after

which the benefit to the economy would taper off dramatically.


Taken together, these flawed assumptions undermine the argument that swayed
some House Democrats to support drilling. As the Senate prepares to vote on

the matter this fall - Energy Committee hearings begin next week - members

should stick to more recent and defensible analyses.


It is important to remember, for example, that jobs created in clean energy
technologies produce multiplier effects throughout the economy, too. The

Department of Energy has estimated that investments in renewable energy

research could create a $3 billion export market by 2010, creating 100,000

jobs.


Senator Edward Kennedy, who opposes drilling in the Arctic refuge, is the
strongest friend labor has in Washington. In the coming weeks his leadership

will be needed to show that jobs can be compatible with a sustainable

environment and a safe, clean, affordable energy supply.


© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company

###
 The greening of Planet Earth and other stories

Friday, September 07, 2001
By Kathleen Wong, California Academy of Sciences

 
 

This article originally appeared on the California Wild Web site, which is
published by the California Academy of Sciences

The Greening of Planet Earth

More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere seems to be turning the planet into a
literal greenhouse. Satellites have spotted that vegetation in Earth's

Northern Hemisphere is now denser than it was 20 years ago, with plants

growing like, well, weeds.

The effect was strongest in Eurasia, in forests ranging from central Europe
through largely undeveloped far-east Russia. The growing season in Eurasia is

now nearly 18 days longer than in 1981 because spring has been arriving a

week early, and fall has been delayed by about 10 days. In North America,

where forest fragments in the East and the grasslands of the upper Midwest

have seen the most change in growth patterns, the growing season has now

lengthened by about 12 days.

The scientists, from the NASA and Boston University, will publish their work
in the Journal of Geophysical Research — Atmospheres.


Light Reaction Rains Mercury on the Arctic

It was a chemical whodunit worthy of Agatha Christie. Each spring since 1998,
scientists have noticed a surge in toxic mercury levels in the chill Arctic

air. The harmful element has been accumulating in the fragile northern food

chain, with carnivores such as people, fish, and large mammals carrying

unusually high levels.

Now Julia Lu and colleagues at the Meteorological Service of Canada and
Toronto have followed the plot twists and fingered the guilty. The trail

starts in the tailpipes and smokestacks of autos and power plants that burn

fossil fuels, which release about 4,000 tons of mercury vapor into the air

every year.

In the Arctic, the sudden burst of summer sunlight reacts with chemicals in
sea salt to transform the mercury vapor into biologically harmful mercury

oxide. The reaction occurs just as the region's animals and plants are

growing rapidly to make the most of the fleeting two-month Arctic summer. The

same process has been observed in the Antarctic. Together the two poles add

an estimated 150 tons of poisonous mercury to the global food chain every

year.


Copyright 2001, California Academy of Sciences
All Rights Reserved

 

     

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has

not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making

such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of

environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and

social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any

such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright

Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this

site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving the included information for research and educational

purposes. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your

own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright

owner.

 

Return to News Home

Return to Climate Change Campaign Home