THANKS-A-MILLION!
UPDATE ON THE INHOFE AMENDMENTS

SENATOR REID FILES FOR CLOTURE

MORE AMENDMENTS AHEAD

TAKE ACTION!

HOW ELSE YOU CAN HELP

ACTIVIST RESOURCES

THANKS-A-MILLION!
Dear wonderful Arctic Refuge friends and supporters.  Thank you for enduring

the chaotic legislative whirlwind of the last 10 days.  We’ll continue to

keep you updated about what’s going on in Washington, we’ll continue to

weather this storm together, and together we’ll protect America’s Arctic

National Wildlife Refuge.

UPDATE ON THE INHOFE AMENDMENT
When we last sent out our update, Senator Inhofe (R-OK) had gone to the

Senate floor to reaffirm his intention to attach two amendments to the

Senate Defense Authorization Bill.  One amendment is an energy bill

previously introduced by Senator Murkowski, the other H.R. 4, the full House

energy bill that includes $38 billion in oil, coal, nuclear and auto

subsidies.  Both amendments include a provision to mandate drilling for oil

and gas in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The Defense Authorization bill was originally scheduled for a vote last
Monday or Tuesday, but as of Wednesday afternoon, when the Senate adjourned

for the Yom Kippur holiday, the Defense Authorization bill had not come up

for a vote, and neither had the Inhofe amendments.  In fact, we believe that

the Inhofe amendments are responsible for delaying the entire Defense bill!

Politicians, both those that support and oppose drilling, agree that the

Inhofe amendment is totally inappropriate at a time when critical national

security legislation is needed – yet Senator Inhofe has thus far refused to

back down.

SENATOR REID FILES FOR CLOTURE
Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and 18 other Senators filed for cloture on the

Defense Authorization Bill on Wednesday.  If Senator Reid gets the 60 votes

he needs for cloture on the Defense Authorization bill, then only amendments

that pertain directly to the legislation can be offered – which would rule

out both Inhofe amendments!  We want Senators to vote for cloture, and thus

block the Inhofe amendments and let the Defense bill pass free of Arctic

Refuge drilling legislation, which will do nothing to improve our national

security now or in the future.  The vote on cloture will be at 10am on

Tuesday 10/2 – please call your Senators and ask them to oppose unrelated

amendments to allow drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic National Wildlife

Refuge and support cloture on Defense Authorization Bill.

MORE AMENDMENTS AHEAD
Senator Murkowski told our Senate champions on Wednesday that he intends to

attach Arctic Refuge drilling language or an energy bill that includes

Arctic Refuge drilling as an amendment to any amendable bill (which is

pretty much any bill that moves to the Senate floor), and he has been quoted

as saying he has 51 votes.  If Senator Murkowski appears to have enough

votes to succeed in this attempt, we will need our Arctic Refuge supporters

in the Senate to filibuster these damaging and divisive amendments.  Senator

Murkowski also released a statement last week in which he said, “I am

prepared to hold up normal legislative business to get an energy bill to the

floor.”

TAKE ACTION!
Please call your Senators today at (202) 224-3121.  Ask them to oppose both

Inhofe amendments to the Defense Authorization Bill, along with any other

amendments to allow drilling for oil and gas in America’s Arctic National

Wildlife Refuge.  It is inappropriate to consider such a divisive and

damaging policy during this time of national crisis.  Additionally, drilling

in the Arctic Refuge would not produce oil for roughly ten years, and would

do nothing now or ten years from now to increase our national security or

reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

HOW ELSE YOU CAN HELP
- Recruit your friends and neighbors to the cause!  Walk next door and ask

your neighbor to make a call about this important issue.  If you have a cell

phone, bring it along.

- If you are a student, get your friends to donate the use of their cell

phones for an impromptu call in day.  Have literature available and ask

people who walk by to call.

- Write a letter to the editor of your local paper.

- Call your Senators' local offices (numbers are in the phone book)

- If your Senator supports protecting the Arctic Refuge, write him or her a

thoughtful letter.  Be sure to include your name, address, and phone number

at the bottom and the words “you have my permission to read this letter on

the Senate floor.”  Maybe they’ll read it as part of a filibuster!

- For more information visit www.alaskawild.org, or contact Jen Schmidt with

the Alaska Wilderness League at jen@alaskawild.org .

TALKING POINTS
The following talking points are great for letters, letters to the editor,

and for better understanding the Arctic Refuge debate.

- America cannot drill its way to energy independence.  The U.S. has at most
2-3% of the world's oil reserves while accounting for 25% of the world's oil

consumption.  It is simply not possible to produce our way to oil

independence, even if we sacrifice all of our wilderness, parks, refuges,

and coastlines.  The only way to reduce dependence on foreign oil is through

conservation and alternative energy supplies.

- The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that oil recovered from the Arctic
Refuge would amount to less than a six month supply for American consumers.

At no time would oil from the refuge be expected to amount to more than

about 2 percent of US demand. We would still need to import over half of our

oil from foreign countries.

- Under any circumstances, Arctic drilling cannot respond to our immediate
or near term needs for national security.  It would take seven to ten years

to bring Arctic Refuge oil to market.  There is no justification whatsoever

for “rushing to judgment” on the Arctic Refuge in response to the terrorist

attacks.

- Conservation, increasing fuel efficiency and alternative energy are much
better national security measures than drilling in the Arctic Refuge.

Alternative energy facilities can be smaller, dispersed and easily rebuilt.

- America does need a sound national energy policy, but we simply can’t
drill our way to lower prices or energy independence.  There are reliable

and sensible means of achieving these ends – such as energy conservation,

alternative energies and improved energy efficiency - which can reduce our

dependence on oil without sacrificing environmental protection.

- Recently, a lot of emphasis has been placed on the number of jobs that
would be generated by drilling in the Arctic Refuge coastal plain.

Unfortunately, the numbers commonly touted by those in favor of drilling

(750,000 jobs) come from a flawed 1990 study commissioned by the American

Petroleum Institute (API). According to subsequent independent studies, the

API study used highly questionable economic analysis and exaggerated

estimates.  A 1994 study by the Economic Policy Institute concluded that the

total number of jobs generated by drilling in the refuge would be fewer than

8 percent than what the API study predicted, and even those would last only

five years. Meanwhile, a 1993 study, conducted by the Tellus Institute for

The Wilderness Society, concluded that initiatives to improve vehicle fuel

efficiency and non-transport energy efficiency would result in nearly 10

times as many jobs as drilling in the Arctic Refuge.

ACTIVIST RESOURCES

Take Action at http://www.alaskawild.org

Don’t know who your Representative is? Find out at
http://www.house.gov/writerep

Have your members of Congress cosponsored the Arctic Wilderness Bills
H.R.770 / S.411? Go to http://thomas.loc.gov/ then type in the bill number.

Cosponsors are listed under “bill summary and status.

U.S. Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121

Senate Address: The Honorable _______, US Senate, Washington, DC 20510


House Address: The Honorable _______,US House of Representatives,
Washington, DC 20515

Contacting the President: George W. Bush, The White House, Washington DC
20500

White House Comment Desk: (202) 456-1111, Fax: (202) 456-2461

Call Sir John Browne, CEO of BP Amoco, 1-800 U-TELL-BP

Send a letter to the editor of your local paper at
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/letterstoeditor/index.html

Send a FREE fax to protect Alaska’s Rainforest at www.akrain.org



Published on Monday, October 1, 2001 in the Seattle Times
Environmental Issues Will Resurface As Truce Ends 

by Elizabeth Shogren and Deborah Schoch of the Los Angeles Times

 

Stilled by the events of Sept. 11, strong disagreements over the environment

could resurface as early as this week to test the political truce in

Washington, D.C.

Lawmakers are poised to resume a partisan fight over oil drilling in the

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. And as they return to the nation's domestic

agenda, they must contend with global warming, national forest protections,

arsenic in drinking water and air quality.

All are issues that had put the environment near the center of the policy
divide separating the White House and congressional Democrats.

That divide all but disappeared, or so it seemed, as Washington came together
in response to the terrorist attacks.

Major environmental groups laid down their swords, some purging their Web
sites of anti-Bush rhetoric, delaying direct-mail appeals and encouraging

members to redirect donations to rescue efforts, such as the American Red

Cross.

Now, signs of renewed strife are emerging as some Senate Republicans seek to
make domestic energy a national-security issue, and dissenters rise to argue

that a national emergency does not require sacrificing environmental goals.

That discord could erupt when the Senate reconvenes this week, and especially
if Sen. Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, joins Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., in

trying to force a vote on an energy bill that would allow oil drilling in the

Arctic Refuge.

Many environmentalists hope to delay a vote on the entire energy package
until early next year. Inhofe tried to force the Senate to vote last week on

the energy legislation by filing an amendment on an unrelated

defense-authorization bill. The effort by Inhofe and others brought that bill

to a standstill.

When the Senate adjourned for a long weekend, Inhofe had not given up on his
plan to offer the amendment unless he gets a commitment from the Senate

leadership to take up energy legislation by a date certain.

"I will not agree ... to attempts to force through a one-sided energy bill or
to short-circuit Senate consideration of these important issues," said Sen.

Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., Senate Energy Committee chairman.

Sen. James Jeffords, I-Vt., Environment and Public Works chairman, warned his
colleagues that Inhofe's amendments could hurt public health and

environmental quality and raise greenhouse-gas emissions at a time when the

United States faces international criticism for failing to pay serious

attention to climate-change issues.

But Murkowski said last week that the new war against terrorism makes it
imperative that the United States develop oil reserves on its own soil,

decreasing dependence on Middle Eastern oil. Since Sept. 11, lobbyists on

both sides of the energy debate have remained relatively quiet.

But for environmentalists, the energy bill could be the point at which any
truce ends. For them, the challenge is how to be loyal Americans at the time

of national emergency while still being true to their values and to their

supporters.

Before Sept. 11, the issue of global warming also loomed large.

Bush was receiving widespread public criticism for rejecting the Kyoto
accord, the international agreement to reduce greenhouse gases.

The administration was under pressure to produce a U.S. strategy to unveil at
the next international climate-control meeting, scheduled for late next month

in Marrakech, Morocco.

But some of the administration's strongest advocates of a global-warming
policy — Secretary of State Colin Powell and Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill

— are deeply involved in the immediate crisis.

The United States still plans to send a delegation to Marrakech, but
expectations are not high that the administration will produce a viable

option to Kyoto.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is delaying introduction
of legislation that would change the federal government's approach to

regulating pollution from power plants.

The EPA had said it would release its blueprint in September for controlling
mercury, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen-oxide emissions from power plants.

But EPA spokesman Dave Ryan last week said the schedule for that initiative —
and many others — had slipped as a result of the terrorist attacks. Now the

target for producing the administration's plan is sometime this fall, he

said.

Copyright © 2001 The Seattle Times Company

###
US senator pushes for drilling in Alaskan refuge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
 

Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

 

USA: October 1, 2001

 

WASHINGTON - A leading Republican lawmaker last week welcomed OPEC's decision
to maintain production levels, but said the U.S. needs to boost its own

energy supplies by opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.

 

Sen. Larry Craig, an Idaho Republican, said the attacks in New York and
Washington on Sept. 11 have made it crucial for the United States to open the

Arctic refuge to ensure the oil supplies and economic growth.

Supporters of drilling in ANWR estimate the Alaskan wilderness area could

contain up to 16 billion barrels of oil, equal to the amount of crude the

United States imports from Iraq for 70 years.

"We're highly dependent on foreign oil and any glitch in that system would
find us in a desperate situation with our economy and our people," Craig told

reporters on Capitol Hill.

"The reality is we can drill in ANWR, and we can do it safely," added Craig,
who was joined by several union and manufacturing representatives.

Republican lawmakers have lobbied for opening the refuge to help reduce U.S.
dependence on oil imports, especially shipments from the powerful OPEC cartel.

With the world economy struggling, OPEC producers on Thursday left oil
production levels unchanged, waiting until November to decide whether to cut

output to lift slumping crude prices.

The announcement was applauded by Craig and other lawmakers including Energy
Secretary Spencer Abraham who said a cut would have further hit an already

depressed economy.

"They recognize this flat economy worldwide, and they could have made it a
lot flatter if they lowered production," Craig said.

The Senate Energy Committee has yet to resume debate on a comprehensive
energy bill, and with about a month left before Congress adjourns, a vote by

the full chamber is not imminent.

Sen. Frank Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, has pushed a stripped-down
version of the bill that includes opening up the refuge, and offering

incentives to aid U.S. electric, coal, natural gas and nuclear energy

production.

But Democrat Jeff Bingaman from New Mexico, who heads the Senate Energy
Committee, said he wants to stick with a broader plan that includes electric

restructuring and energy conservation measures.

Craig said ANWR is no longer a "sticking point" within the Senate, and a
drafted energy bill would likely blend several provisions from Murkowski and

Bingaman's bills.

"All of the components are there, it is simply the will of the leadership to
produce (legislation) that is holding it up," said Craig, who would like to

send a final bill to the president this year before Congress adjourns.

In another measure to boost U.S. oil supplies, Congress also has considered
purchasing oil for the country's Strategic Petroleum Reserves.

With the sharp drop to oil prices in recent weeks, an opportunity to increase
emergency reserves would be a bigger buffer to a disruption in U.S. crude

supplies.

Rep. Joe Barton said Tuesday the House might consider legislation to increase
oil reserves if prices drop a few dollars below their recent level of $22 per

barrel.

Craig said that while there were no plans to introduce a similar proposal in
the Senate, it is something they could "absolutely" consider at some point.

"It's a time when we might just see a market of lower crude prices, and that
is an opportunity," he said.

 

Story by Christopher Doering
 

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
 

Murkowski set to stall Senate

ANWR: Senator says energy bill vital, wants it to come to floor soon.


By Liz Ruskin
Anchorage Daily News

(Published: September 28, 2001)
Washington -- In a bid to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil

drilling, Sen. Frank Murkowski has threatened to stall Senate business unless

Democratic leaders agree to proceed with an energy bill.

"I am prepared to hold up normal legislative business to get an energy bill
to the floor," Murkowski, R-Alaska, said in a written statement this week. A

spokesman said Murkowski

hasn't specified exactly how he would do that.

The bills that Congress is considering include responses to the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks, such as possible sanctions against countries that support

terrorists and a bill aimed at stimulating the economy.

"In my view, energy is just as important to our nation's immediate and
long-term interests," Murkowski said. "It seems to me that energy also fits

in with any economic stimulus or national security package under

consideration."

The Senate is also working on a bill authorizing next year's defense
programs. Murkowski said he has warned the Senate leadership that he'll

object to moving the defense authorization bill unless he gets a commitment

on energy.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle pulled the $345 billion defense bill off
the floor this week because Republicans would not agree on which amendments

should be debated.

Among the amendments standing in the way are two by Sen. James Inhofe,
R-Okla., that would tack a Republican energy bill, including ANWR drilling,

to the defense bill.

Murkowski initially rejected that tactic. Last week, when Congress was trying
to respond to the terror attacks with a united front, he said it would be

"inappropriate and in poor taste."

This week, though, both Murkowski and Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said the
energy amendments should not be taken down without assurances that the Senate

will consider an energy bill later.

The oil in the refuge, which could be as much as 16 billion barrels, would
make the country less dependent on oil from the Middle East, Murkowski says

in arguing that ANWR is important to national energy security.

Another of his arguments: If America goes to war, it will need lots of fuel.

The House has already passed an energy bill that would allow drilling in the
refuge.

Environmentalists and congressional opponents of ANWR drilling say that the
refuge doesn't hold enough oil to make a dent in crude imports but that

developing fuel-efficient cars and alternative energy would be effective. It

would take a decade for ANWR oil to hit the market, so it is irrelevant to

any impending war, they say.

Daschle said approval of the defense authorization bill is urgent.

"Our troops are counting on it. The Pentagon needs it," he said Wednesday. He
had hoped for speedy passage of the bill to show the world that Congress is

united on defense.

Energy policy is also important and he intends to address it, Daschle said.

"But we just can't say today when that will be," he said.

Murkowski said he has heard that Democrats are considering taking up energy
in February. That's unacceptable, he said.

His spokesman, Chuck Kleeschulte, said the defense authorization bill is
blocked by other amendments and Murkowski hasn't yet impeded any legislation.

"We're not really holding up anything," Kleeschulte said.

Murkowski has not threatened to filibuster.

"Senator Murkowski has not made clear" what method he would use, Kleeschulte
said. "There are any number of ways senators can delay normal Senate

business," he said.

Nor would Kleeschulte say what constitutes the sort of "normal legislative
business" Murkowski is considering holding up.

He wouldn't say, for example, whether Murkowski would also consider slowing
the annual defense spending bill, the measure that actually appropriates

money to the military.

"I have no answer to that," he said.

A lone senator or a small group of senators can bog the process down -- by
requiring votes on routine matters or by requiring the clerk to read a bill

in its entirety, for example -- but unless they have significant support,

they can be steamrolled by the majority.

Reporter Liz Ruskin can be reached at 1-202-383-0007 or lruski@nadn.com.





 
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has

not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making

such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of

environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and

social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any

such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright

Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this

site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving the included information for research and educational

purposes. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your

own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright

owner.

Return to News Home

Return to Climate Change Campaign Home